Lord of the Flies: Golding’s attempt to delineate the reality of human civilization || By- Sanjeedeep Mishra (2022)
In Lord of the Flies, William Golding has tried to
portray mankind’s essential illness and has traced the emergence of evil. The
group of boys inherited the island in state of innocence, they set up authority
and order but later ignored the voice of authority and violated the rules. From
humans, they became animals and then savages. They soon were liberated from the
shame and consciousness. They tried to find beast everywhere, the air, the
water, but in reality, just like Simon, one of the boys said, “Maybe there
is a beast… maybe it's only us.”
The Typhonic element of human nature was introduced in the novel, with the introduction of Jack Merridew. Jack is prone to blush when he is angry and frustrated. During Ralph’s election for being the chief of the group of boys in the island, Jack’s face “blushes with mortification”. Golding again describes his face on the Second Vote, “Jack turned red in face” because he has been outwitted. Thus, blushing appears to be the manifestation of wounded pride. Jack was ambitious and carried an overwhelming desire of to be the chief. After his second parliamentary defeat, he reacts to it by creating a new clan and waging war against Ralph’s. Jack who earlier could not endure to cut the flesh of the pig because of the unbearable blood, now “grabbed Maurice and rubbed the stuff over his cheeks” From here, it is a short step to the murder of Simon during one of the orgiastic ritual dance, to the killing of Piggy by the sadistic Roger that “slight, furtive boy whom no one knew, who kept to himself with an inner intensity of avoidance and secrecy.” – and the plan to cut-off Ralph’s head and transfix it on the stick sharpened on both the ends.
In the name of “fun n’ games”, Jack soon gets the majority
of boys in the island (leaving Ralph, Piggy, Sam and Eric) into his clan and
reverts them into pure savagery. Wearing of the paint as mask is the first sign
of masking themselves from shame and guilt. Later, the orgiastic ritual of “Killing
the Sow”, while chanting "Kill the pig! Cut her throat! Spill her
blood!", marks the successful transition of the boys into savagery. In
the episode of killing of the sow, Golding presents a wide range of expression of
male lust including, the sexual. Golding thinks that the drive-in man towards
conquests and destruction is conjectured in a parallel way in sexual realm,
which is clear from this episode.
Golding depicts Simon as a saint, a Christ like
character, as he revealed in one of his interview. A saint is as Chesterton
revealed, “a medicine because he is an antidote. He is mistaken for poison
because he is an antidote.” Simon’s insight into the beast offers the boys the
possibility of salvation on the island. He later discovers the novel’s truth about
man’s fallen nature and the true identity of the beast. But, just like Christ, Simon meets the similar
fate.
With Henry, a child whom the society deems to be as an
innocent, seeks to gain mastery over little creature. Even though he can be distinguished
from Jack in terms of the magnitude of power, it is still terrible. Golding
tries to delineate mankind’s essential illness in the lines below,
“This was fascinating to Henry. He poked
about with a bit of stick, that itself was wave-tom and whitened and a vagram,
and tried to control the motions of the scavengers. He made little runnels that
the tide filled and tried to crowd them with creatures. He became absorbed
beyond mere happiness as he felt himself exercising control over living things.
He talked to them. Urging them, ordering them. Driven back by the tide. His
footprints became bays in which they were trapped and gave him the illusion of
mastery.”
Golding has attempted to assess the interaction
between the man and society in Lord of the Flies. The development of society depends
upon on the nature of man. The defects of society therefore can be traced back
to the defects of human nature. By choosing children as the protagonists of the
novel, Golding is trying to emphasizing that evil is inherent in man’s nature,
society tames our base violent instinct and the childhood only serves to veil
it.
References-
1. White,
R. J. (1964). BUTTERFLY AND BEAST IN “LORD OF THE FLIES.” Modern Fiction
Studies, 10(2), 163–170. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26278635
2. Bufkin,
E. C. (1965). Lord of the Flies: An Analysis. The Georgia Review, 19(1), 40–57.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/41398168
3. Lloyd
Grove, January 12, 1986, The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1986/01/12/golding-lord-of-the-novel/274c53ca-e802-4f4a-94b0-8246563f6223/



Comments
Post a Comment